Models of collective and individual human expertise
Turing Test technologies are promising ways to validate AI systems that may have no alternative way to indicate validity. Unfortunately, human experts are sometimes too expensive to be heavily involved in the Turing Test process. Furthermore, they often have different opinions from each other as wel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Synergies between information processing and automation ; Vol. 2: Session 4-10 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Pages: | 2 |
| Format: | UnknownFormat |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2004
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Tag hinzufügen | Zusammenfassung: | Turing Test technologies are promising ways to validate AI systems that may have no alternative way to indicate validity. Unfortunately, human experts are sometimes too expensive to be heavily involved in the Turing Test process. Furthermore, they often have different opinions from each other as well as from themselves over time. One way out of this situation is to employ a Validation Knowledge Base (VKB) that is the collective experience of human expert panels. VKB is constructed and maintained across various validation sessions. Furthermore, Validation Experts Software Agents (VESA) are introduced as a model of the individual experience of a particular human expert, which can serve as his/her substitute in case of the expert's unavailability. A Turing Test experiment with a small prototype system indicates the usefulness of these concepts to model the collective (VKB) and individual (VESA) validation expertise. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 3832228241 |