Publikationen im Fachbereich Kinderzahnheilkunde im Jahre 2016 interindividuelle Variation bei der Auswahl der besten kinderzahnmedizinischen Fachbeiträge

Dissertation, Universitätsmedizin der Universität Greifswald, 2020

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Otto, Rebecca (VerfasserIn)
Körperschaft: Universität Greifswald (Grad-verleihende Institution)
Weitere Verfasser: Splieth, Christian (AkademischeR BetreuerIn), Bekes, Katrin (AkademischeR BetreuerIn)
Format: UnknownFormat
Sprache:ger
Veröffentlicht: Greifswald 2020
Schlagworte:
Hochschulschrift > Kind > Zahnmedizin > Veröffentlichung > Zeitschriftenaufsatz > Evidenz-basierte Medizin > Auswahl > Geschichte 2016
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dissertation, Universitätsmedizin der Universität Greifswald, 2020
Kinderzahnheilkunde, evidenzbasierte Zahnheilkunde
The rising number of publications makes it difficult to identify those articles that are needed to stay up-to-date with the latest scientific findings and evidence-based recommendations. Aim The aim of the study was to record the search preferences of five different dentists with regard to their selection of the five most valuable publications issued in the year 2016 in the field of pediatric dentistry. Material & methods The participants were identical with the five authors of this article. Four of them are pediatric dentists, whereas one (JCT) is dedicated to patients with orofacial pain and/or dysfunction of the masticatory system. The participants were asked to include independently from one another the following five databases in their search: • PubMed (URL: https://www.pubmed.gov) • Livivo (URL: https://www.livivo.de) • Google Scholar (URL: https://scholar.google.de ; https.scholar.google.ch) • Directory of Open Access Journals (URL: https://www.doaj.org) • Free Medical Journals <www.freemedicaljournals.com> Additional electronic and other sources could be considered. The individual search strategies were documented. The selection criteria were assessed by using a 10-point checklist (Fig. 1); multiple answers were allowed. The identified publications were evaluated according to their publication type (e.g., systematic review, article about a randomized controlled trial, etc.). Results There was no overlap among the publications chosen by the participants, i.e., 25 ...
Beschreibung:Literaturverzeichnis: Blatt 41-47
Beschreibung:50 Blätter
Diagramme (farbig)