EU media ownership regulation conflict over the definition of alternatives

The article addresses the politics of agenda-setting in the European Union (EU) policy process by utilizing the case of media ownership regulation. The author argues that the selection of a 'frame' (as defined in Schön and Rein, 1994) for media ownership regulation has been the object of c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of common market studies
1. Verfasser: Harcourt, Alison (VerfasserIn)
Format: UnknownFormat
Sprache:eng
Veröffentlicht: 1998
Schlagworte:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The article addresses the politics of agenda-setting in the European Union (EU) policy process by utilizing the case of media ownership regulation. The author argues that the selection of a 'frame' (as defined in Schön and Rein, 1994) for media ownership regulation has been the object of conflict between and within EU institutions, most crucially within the Commission. Conflict, however, has been a resource in the policy process as it has brought in different legitimate interests and perspectives. The article has theoretical implications for the study of agenda-setting, organizational behaviour in the EU, and the analysis of the EU policy process. (Journal of Common Market Studies / FUB)
Beschreibung:Tab., Lit. S. 388-389
ISSN:0021-9886