Social mobility and the demand for income redistribution in Latin America
Alesina and Angeletos (2005) and Alesina and Glaeser (2004) argue that income. - redistribution preferences vary systematically between the different regions and. - influence the size of government and the composition of public spending. This article. - analyses the demand for redistribution in Lati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vereinte Nationen. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean CEPAL review |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , |
Format: | UnknownFormat |
Sprache: | eng |
Veröffentlicht: |
2013
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Alesina and Angeletos (2005) and Alesina and Glaeser (2004) argue that income. - redistribution preferences vary systematically between the different regions and. - influence the size of government and the composition of public spending. This article. - analyses the demand for redistribution in Latin America, paying particular attention. - to the effects of mobility expectations on this demand. The findings suggest that. - demand for redistribution is driven primarily by self-interest and by considerations. - of fairness based on the inequality of opportunities. They also reveal the importance. - of past mobility, while the prospect of upward mobility (POUM) hypothesis advanced. - by Benabou and Ok (2001) is rejected in the case of the Latin America region. (CEPAL/GIGA) |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | graph. Darst. |
ISSN: | 0251-2920 |