Marcan priority without Q explorations in the Farrer hypothesis
Machine generated contents note:Introduction - John C. Poirier and Jeffrey Peterson1. 'The Devil in the Detail: Exorcising Q from the Beelzebul Controversy' - Eric Eve2. 'Problems with the Non-Aversion Principle for Reconstructing Q' - Stephen C. Carlson3. 'Luke-Crank or Cre...
Gespeichert in:
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | UnknownFormat |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Veröffentlicht: |
London u.a.
Bloomsbury T & T Clark
2015
|
| Ausgabe: | 1. publ. |
| Schriftenreihe: | Library of New Testament studies
455 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Klappentext Cover |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Tag hinzufügen 
| Zusammenfassung: | Machine generated contents note:Introduction - John C. Poirier and Jeffrey Peterson1. 'The Devil in the Detail: Exorcising Q from the Beelzebul Controversy' - Eric Eve2. 'Problems with the Non-Aversion Principle for Reconstructing Q' - Stephen C. Carlson3. 'Luke-Crank or Creative Genius? How Ancient Rhetoric Makes Sense of Luke's Order' - Heather M. Gorman4. 'Too Good to be Q: High Verbatim Agreement in the Double Tradition' - Mark Goodacre5. 'Luke 11.2-4: The Lord's Prayer (Abridged Edition)' - Ken Olson6. 'A Statistical Time Series Approach to the Use of Mark by Matthew and Luke' - Andris Abakuks7. 'Matthew's Ending and the Genesis of Acts: The Farrer Hypothesis and the Composition of Luke's Two Volumes' - Jeffrey Peterson8. 'Reconsidering the Date of Luke in Light of the Farrer Hypothesis' - David Landry9. 'Delbert Burkett's Defense of Q' - John C. Poirier10. Response - John S. KloppenborgBibliographyIndex. "This book discusses the composition of the synoptic gospels from the perspective of the Farrer hypothesis, a view that posits that Mark was written first, that Matthew used Mark as a source, and that Luke used both Mark and Matthew. All of the articles in the volume are written in support of the Farrer hypothesis, with the exception of the final chapter, which criticizes these articles from the perspective of the reigning Two-Source theory. The contributors engage the synoptic problem with a more refined understanding of the options set before each of the evangelists pointing towards a deepened understanding of how works were compiled in the first and early second centuries CE. The contributors include Andris Abakuks, Stephen Carlson, Eric Eve, Mark Goodacre, Heather Gorman, John S. Kloppenborg, David Landry, Mark Matson, Ken Olson, Michael Pahl, Jeffrey Peterson, and John C. Poirier"-- Machine generated contents note: -- Introduction - John C. Poirier and Jeffrey Peterson1. 'The Devil in the Detail: Exorcising Q from the Beelzebul Controversy' - Eric Eve2. 'Problems with the Non-Aversion Principle for Reconstructing Q' - Stephen C. Carlson3. 'Luke-Crank or Creative Genius? How Ancient Rhetoric Makes Sense of Luke's Order' - Heather M. Gorman4. 'Too Good to be Q: High Verbatim Agreement in the Double Tradition' - Mark Goodacre5. 'Luke 11.2-4: The Lord's Prayer (Abridged Edition)' - Ken Olson6. 'A Statistical Time Series Approach to the Use of Mark by Matthew and Luke' - Andris Abakuks7. 'Matthew's Ending and the Genesis of Acts: The Farrer Hypothesis and the Composition of Luke's Two Volumes' - Jeffrey Peterson8. 'Reconsidering the Date of Luke in Light of the Farrer Hypothesis' - David Landry9. 'Delbert Burkett's Defense of Q' - John C. Poirier10. Response - John S. KloppenborgBibliographyIndex |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 245-259) and index |
| Beschreibung: | XIV, 272 S. |
| ISBN: | 9780567159137 978-0-567-15913-7 |