The press effect politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world
"Was the 2000 presidential campaign merely a contest between Pinocchio and Dumbo? And did Dumbo miraculously turn into Abraham Lincoln after the events of September 11? In fact, Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Paul Waldman argue in The Press Effect, these stereotypes, while containing some elements...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | |
Format: | UnknownFormat |
Sprache: | eng |
Veröffentlicht: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2003
|
Schlagworte: |
USA
> Geschichte 1993-2001
> Berichtgeving
> Gouvernement
> Invloed
> Journalisme - Aspect politique - États-Unis
> Journalisme politique
> Journalisme
> Journalistiek
> Objectivité
> Politieke aspecten
> Politique
> Presse - Objectivité - États-Unis
> Presse et politique - États-Unis
> Presse
> Politik
> Journalism
> Objectivity
> Journalismus
> Objektivität
> États-Unis - Politique et gouvernement - 1993-2001
> États-Unis
> United States
> Politics and government
|
Online Zugang: | Table of contents Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | "Was the 2000 presidential campaign merely a contest between Pinocchio and Dumbo? And did Dumbo miraculously turn into Abraham Lincoln after the events of September 11? In fact, Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Paul Waldman argue in The Press Effect, these stereotypes, while containing some elements of the truth, represent the failure of the press and the citizenry to engage the most important part of our political process in a critical fashion. Jamieson and Waldman analyze both press coverage and public opinion, using the Annenberg 2000 survey, which interviewed more than 100,000 people, to examine one of the most interesting periods of modern presidential history, from the summer of 2000 through the beginning of 2002 How does the press fail us during presidential elections? Jamieson and Waldman show that when political campaigns side-step or refuse to engage the facts of the opposing side, the press often fails to step into the void with the information citizens require to make sense of the political give-and-take. They look at the stories through which we understand political events-examining a number of fabrications that deceived the public about consequential governmental activities-and explore the ways in which political leaders and reporters select the language through which we talk and think about politics, and the relationship between the rhetoric of campaigns and the reality of governance. They explore the role of the campaigns and the press in casting the 2000 general election as a contest between Pinocchio and Dumbo, and ask whether in 2000 the press applied the same standards of truth-telling to both Bush and Gore The unprecedented events of election night and the thirty-six days that followed revealed the role that preconceptions play in press interpretation and the importance of press frames in determining the tone of political coverage as well as the impact of network overconfidence in polls. The Press Effect is, ultimately, a wide-ranging critique of the press's role in mediating between politicians and the citizens they are supposed to serve." http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0612/2002009845-d.html |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Includes bibliographical references and index. |
Beschreibung: | xvii, 220 p. 25 cm |
ISBN: | 0195152778 0-19-515277-8 |