Assessing the validity of stated preference data using follow-up questions

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Contingent valuation of environmental goods
1. Verfasser:	Myers, Kelley (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser:	MacNair, Doug (VerfasserIn), Graham-Tomasi, Theodore D. (VerfasserIn), Schneider, Jude (VerfasserIn)
Format:	UnknownFormat
Sprache:	eng
Veröffentlicht:	2017
Schlagworte:	Aufsatz im Buch
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Titel	Jahr	Verfasser
Fat tails truncated bids in contingent valuation : an application to an endangered shorebird species	2017	Parsons, George R.
Inferences from stated preference surveys when some respondents do not compare costs and benefits	2017	Leamer, Edward E.
Inadequate response to frequency of payments in contingent valuation of environmental goods	2017	Myers, Kelley
Assessing the validity of stated preference data using follow-up questions	2017	Myers, Kelley
Hypothetical bias : a new meta-analysis	2017	Foster, Harry
Legal obstacles for contingent valuation methods in environmental litigation	2017	Israel, Brian D.
Response to cost prompts in stated preference valuation of environmental goods	2017	Burrows, James
Some findins from further exploration of the "composite good" approach to contingent valuation	2017	Kemp, Michael
Stated preference methods and their applicability to environmental use and non-use valuations	2017	McFadden, Daniel
An adding-up test on contingent valuations of river and lake quality	2017	Desvousges, William Harold
Do contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay for non-use environmental goods pass the scope test with adequacy? : a review of the evidence from empirical studies in the literature	2017	Burrows, James