Philosophia peripatetica emendata Leibniz and Des Bosses on the Aristotelian Corporeal Substance
This paper presents Leibniz and Des Bosses's views on extension and the corporeal substance. It presents Des Bosses's philosophical project as a way of shedding light on the well-known correspondence between the two and uses a previously unexplored text: Des Bosses's outline of a meta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the history of philosophy |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | UnknownFormat |
Sprache: | eng |
Veröffentlicht: |
2016
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | Volltext http://search.proquest.com/docview/1812412495 |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This paper presents Leibniz and Des Bosses's views on extension and the corporeal substance. It presents Des Bosses's philosophical project as a way of shedding light on the well-known correspondence between the two and uses a previously unexplored text: Des Bosses's outline of a metaphysical treatise of his own. The paper argues that Leibniz introduced the notion of a substantial bond, at the demand of Des Bosses, in order to secure the reality of extension; that Des Bosses had strong views on matter and extension, which could not be satisfied by Leibniz's proposal; that these views led him to reject Leibniz's notion of the substantial bond; consequently, that Leibniz's notion of corporeal substance was incompatible with the views on matter and extension defended by Des Bosses; and, finally, that Des Bosses developed his metaphysical ideas in 1735 by using Leibnizian insights for his agenda. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-5053 |