McHarry's theodicy a reply
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Analysis |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | UnknownFormat |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Veröffentlicht: |
1980
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Tag hinzufügen | Titel | Jahr | Verfasser |
|---|---|---|
| Why explanation and thus coherence cannot be reduced to probability | 2011 | Siebel, Mark |
| How not to defend ontological cheats | 2010 | Krämer, Stephan |
| On Fitelson's measure of coherence | 2004 | Siebel, Mark |
| Is the best really necessary? | 1990 | Kraemer, E. R. |
| Why only the best is good enough | 1988 | Grover, Stephen |
| McHarry's theodicy : a reply | 1980 | Perkins, R. K. |
| Plantinga and Leibniz's lapse | 1979 | Burch, Robert |
| A theodicy | 1978 | McHarry, John D. |
| Prior on Leibniz's law | 1970 | Nelson, Jack |
| The identity of indiscernibles | 1954 | O'Connor, D. J. |