Crédibiliser pour expertiser le Codex Alimentarius et les comités d'experts FAO-OMS dans la production réglementaire internationale de sécurité sanitaire des aliments
Reproduction de : Thèse de doctorat : Sociologie : Paris, EHESS : 2012
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Körperschaften: | , |
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | UnknownFormat |
| Sprache: | fre |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Frankreich
Verlag nicht ermittelbar
2013
|
| Schlagworte: |
Programme mixte FAO/OMS sur les normes alimentaires
> Politique alimentaire ; 1990-2020
> Alimentation ; Évaluation du risque ; 1990-2020
> Conseillers scientifiques ; 1990-2020
> Alimentation ; Mesures de sécurité ; 1990-2020
> Aliments ; Qualité ; Normes ; 1990-2020
> Industries agroalimentaires ; Qualité ; Contrôle ; 1990-2020
> Thèses et écrits académiques
> Hochschulschrift
|
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Tag hinzufügen | Zusammenfassung: | Reproduction de : Thèse de doctorat : Sociologie : Paris, EHESS : 2012 L’expertise scientifique ... The scientific expertise, produced for the Codex Alimentarius by international committees of the FAO and the WHO, has a growing central role in the regulation of food production and international trade. It is this role and the questions arising from the relation between science and policy that this research work explores by analyzing the “credibilization processes” of expertise. The theoretical framework articulates Sociology of organizations, Sociology of science as well as central concepts of political sociology. The relationship between science and policy is known to be unstable. The FAO-WHO’s expertise is even more unstable with regard to its participation in the international normalization/standardization which has an enforceable power over national regulation systems. This dissertation demonstrates that the “credibilization processes” in which different actors are involved (experts, institutions, regulators, industries, consumers…) enables to reduce this instability. By engaging in these processes, actors obtain the resources to negotiate their position in the relationship to their advantage, and are able to avoid criticism at the same time. We consider the “credibilization processes” as a set of strategies aiming at strengthening “the subject’s ability to state and to take action”, a notion that exceeds the limits of “authority” and “legitimacy”, other central notions. Processes are grasped by analyzing strategies and behavior of institutions as well as experts in their transnational networks and in the course of FAO-WHO collective expertise. The “credibilization processes” rest upon three interdependent dimensions: a procedural credibilization, a collaborative credibilization and a deliberative credibilization. This research illustrates an expertise that is inseparable from the “credibilization processes”. The credibilization is both the result of interdependencies along the expertise, and a prerequisite for interdependencies to exist in order to produce an expertise. The “credibilization processes” analysis unveils a plural expertise, more specifically in between a “traditional” model and a “precautionary” model. Finally, this dissertation questions the relevance of maintaining science and policy separated; a separation always reasserted by national and international authorities, but remaining however implicitly adjusted in practice |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Bibliogr. p.477-493 |
| Beschreibung: | 556 pages 105 x 148 mm |