Facticity judicial review of factual error in comparative perspective

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Oxford handbook of comparative administrative law
1. Verfasser: Daly, Paul (VerfasserIn)
Format: UnknownFormat
Sprache:eng
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Schlagworte:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Titel Jahr Verfasser
An Anglo-American tradition 2021 Cane, Peter
The Germanic tradition of comparative administrative law 2021 Sommermann, Karl-Peter
Negotiating language barriers 2021 Chiti, Edoardo
Diffusion, reception, and transplantation 2021 Prado, Mariana Mota
Presidential regimes 2021 Bocksang Hola, Gabriel Orlando
Administrative law beyond the state : the influence of international and supranational organizations 2021 Della Cananea, Giacinto
Administrative power 2021 Biddulph, Sarah
The EU administrative institutions, their law, and legal scholarship 2021 Mendes, Joana
Implementation : facilitating and overseeing public services at street level 2021 Scott, Colin
Judicial review of administrative reasoning processes 2021 Wilberg, Hanna
The common real-life reference point methodology - or : "the Mcdonald's index" for comparative administrative law and regulation 2021 Dotan, Yoav
Imagining theoretical frameworks 2021 Hofmann, Herwig
Tribunals and adjudication 2021 Bradley, Kieran
Criminal and civil liability 2021 Fairgrieve, Duncan
Administrative procedure 2021 Barnes, Javier
A Middle Eastern tradition 2021 Mallat, Chibli
Comparative administrative law : the view from political science 2021 Lindquist, Stefanie A.
Parliamentary regimes 2021 Ip, Eric C.
Authoritarian regimes 2021 Yap, Po Jen
Separation of powers in comparative perspective : how much protection for the rule of law? 2021 Strauss, Peter L.
Alle Artikel auflisten