Jeremy Bentham, utility, and the golden triangle of happiness
When authors describe "utility" according to Bentham (An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Doubleday, Garden City, 1780), their usual interpretation is in terms of happiness linked to monetary wealth. However, Bentham was a legally-trained philosopher, not an econom...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Wealth(s) and subjective well-being |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | UnknownFormat |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Tag hinzufügen | Zusammenfassung: | When authors describe "utility" according to Bentham (An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Doubleday, Garden City, 1780), their usual interpretation is in terms of happiness linked to monetary wealth. However, Bentham was a legally-trained philosopher, not an economist, and his actual description of utility shows a far more nuanced meaning. He appreciated that life quality exists in two dimensions, objective and subjective, and recognized the uncertain relationship of these dimensions to one another. Monetary wealth does not equate with happiness, either for Bentham or within contemporary psychological science. This chapter concerns present-day understanding of this wealth-happiness interaction, informed by the Theory of Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis. Homeostasis theory provides an explanatory model for predicting the way objective measures of life quality, including money, interact with the subjective experience of trait happiness. One aspect of this understanding involves identifying the key forms of wealth supporting homeostasis. Through the use of multiple regression, these are revealed as money, an intimate relationship, and having an active life purpose. These three homeostatic resources form the "Golden Triangle" of happiness. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 9783030055349 3030055345 |