The good shepherd of Karlsruhe the 'Hartz IV' decision - a good example of regulatory review by the German Federal Constitutional Court?

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The role of constitutional courts in multilevel governance
1. Verfasser:	Meßerschmidt, Klaus (VerfasserIn)
Format:	UnknownFormat
Sprache:	eng
Veröffentlicht:	2013
Schlagworte:
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Titel	Jahr	Verfasser
Constitutional courts and multilevel governance in Europe : editor's indtroduction	2013	Mazmanyan, Armen
Majoritarianism, deliberation and accountability as institutional instincts of constitutional courts	2013	Mazmanyan, Armen
The good shepherd of Karlsruhe : the 'Hartz IV' decision - a good example of regulatory review by the German Federal Constitutional Court?	2013	Meßerschmidt, Klaus
Deliberative practices of constitutional courts in consolidated and non-consolidated democracies	2013	Popelier, Patricia
The court as regulatory watchdog : the procedural approach in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights	2013	Popelier, Patricia
Constitutional courts as guardians of fundamental rights : the constitutionalism of the convention through domestic constitutional adjudication	2013	Van de Heyning, Catherine
The challenges for constitutional courts as guardians of fundamental rights in the European Union	2013	Torres Pérez, Aida
The judicial enforcement of subsidiarity : the comparative quest for an appropriate standard	2013	Vandenbruwaene, Werner
The role of national constitutional courts in the European legal space	2013	Claes, Monica
Regions and constitutional courts in a multilayered Europe	2013	Gamper, Anna
Constitutional courts and deliberative democrarcy	2013	Van Hoecke, Mark
Courts a regulatory watchdogs : does the European Court of Justice bark or bite?	2013	Keyaerts, David
Standing rights and regulatory dynamics in the European Union	2013	Meuwese, Anne