Claims to pre-emptive uses of force some trends and projections and their implications for world order

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International law and armed conflict
1. Verfasser: Reisman, William Michael (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Armstrong, Andrea (VerfasserIn)
Format: UnknownFormat
Sprache:eng
Veröffentlicht: 2007
Schlagworte:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Titel Jahr Verfasser
A revival of the just war theory? 2007 Shearer, Ivan
The law of weaponry : is it adequate? 2007 Boothby, Bill
Topographies of force 2007 Kritsiotis, Dino
The temporal dimension of self-defense : anticipation, pre-emption, prevention and immediacy 2007 Gill, Terry D.
21st century conflict and international humanitarian law : status quo or change? 2007 Watkin, Kenneth
The separation fence in the international court of justice and the high court of justice : commonalities, differences and specifics 2007 Domb, Fania
Claims to pre-emptive uses of force : some trends and projections and their implications for world order 2007 Reisman, William Michael
Responding to transnational terrorism under the jus ad bellum : a normative frame work 2007 Schmitt, Michael N.
Is US adherence to the rule of law in international affairs feasible? 2007 Murphy, John F.
"Unlawful/enemy combatants" : interpretations and consequences 2007 Pejic, Jelena
Ghosts in the machine : some legal issues concerning US military contractors in Iraq 2007 McDonald, Avril
Leaders, courtiers and command responsibility in Shakespeare 2007 Meron, Theodor
Civilian detentions in Iraq 2007 Wall, Andru E.
Transformative military occupation : applying the laws of war and human rights 2007 Roberts, Adam
The adequacy of international humanitarian law rules on belligerent occupation : to what extent may security council resolution 1483 be considered a model for adjustment? 2007 Wolfrum, Rüdiger
Rethinking collective security 2007 Franck, Thomas
The military action in Iraq and international law 2007 Wedgwood, Ruth
Ius ad bellum and ius in bello - the separation between the legality of the use of force and humanitarian rules to be respected in warfare : crucial of outdated? 2007 Sassòli, Marco
"Combatants" : substance or semantics? 2007 Garraway, Charles H. B.
"Benevolent" third states in international armed conflicts : the myth of the irrelevance of the law of neutrality 2007 Heintschel von Heinegg, Wolff
Alle Artikel auflisten