Quality of justice and of judicial reasoning in Italy

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	How to measure the quality of judicial reasoning
1. Verfasser:	Contini, Francesco (VerfasserIn)
Format:	UnknownFormat
Sprache:	eng
Veröffentlicht:	2018
Schlagworte:
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Titel	Jahr	Verfasser
The quality of justice and of judicial reasoning in the Czech Republic	2018	Kühn, Zdeněk
Methods of quality assessment of judicial reasoning in Hungary	2018	Kovács, Ágnes
Reflections on legal reasoning in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights	2018	Davíð Þór Björgvinsson
Quality of legal decisions : the criteria established by the Finnish judiciary	2018	Kiikeri, Markku
Measuring the unmeasurable?	2018	Bencze, Mátyás
Quality of justice and lay participation in the light of scientific studies	2018	Badó, Attila
The quality of adjudication in France	2018	Jeuland, Emmanuel
Judging and the ethical life	2018	Bánkowski, Zenon
How to measure? : An essay on the social context of measuring quality	2018	Fleck, Zoltán
Judicial reasoning from the perspective of behavioural law and economics	2018	Golecki, Mariusz J.
Obstacles and opportunities : measuring the quality of judicial reasoning	2018	Bencze, Mátyás
Quality of judicial reasoning : England and Wales	2018	Ng, Gar Yein
Quality of justice and of judicial reasoning in Italy	2018	Contini, Francesco
Quality of reasoning in international criminal tribunals	2018	Ajevski, Marjan
The quality of decision-making at the Court of Justice of the European Union	2018	Conway, Gerard